United States v. Rickey Lane Keeth

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 98-2939 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Rickey Layne Keeth, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * ___________ Submitted: December 14, 1998 Filed: December 18, 1998 ___________ Before FAGG, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. After Rickey Layne Keeth pleaded guilty to making a false statement in the acquisition of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6), and to possessing firearms while subject to a domestic violence protection order, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8), the district court1 sentenced him to 30 months imprisonment and three years supervised release. Keeth&s period of supervised release commenced in January 1998. As a condition of his supervised release, Keeth was not to attempt to contact his 1 The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. ex-wife in any manner. At a revocation hearing in June 1998, the district court found Keeth had violated this condition, revoked Keeth&s supervised release, and sentenced him to 12 months imprisonment and 24 months supervised release. Keeth now challenges his prison term, and we affirm. After a thorough review of the record, we reject Keeth&s argument that the district court failed to consider the applicable policy statements in Chapter 7 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). We also conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing him to 12 months imprisonment. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3); United States v. Grimes, 54 F.3d 489, 492 (8th Cir. 1995) (standard of review); United States v. Carr, 66 F.3d 981, 983 (8th Cir. 1995) (per curiam) (Chapter 7 Guidelines are advisory and nonbinding; district court may depart from revocation imprisonment range when, in its considered discretion, such departure is warranted). We deny Keeth&s motion for a stay pending appeal and temporary injunction, as well as his motion for appointment of counsel. Keeth&s counsel&s motion to withdraw is granted. Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -2-