In Re: Mintze

Opinions of the United 2006 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-18-2006 In Re: Mintze Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 03-4745 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006 Recommended Citation "In Re: Mintze " (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 1673. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/1673 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2006 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 03-4745 IN RE: ETHEL MARIE MINTZE, Debtor ETHEL MARIE MINTZE v. AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., f/k/a AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE, INC.; AMERICAN GENERAL CONSUMER DISCOUNT CO., collectively, "American General", Appellants EDWARD SPARKMAN, ESQ.; FREDERIC J. BAKER, ESQ., Trustees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. No. 03-cv-02113 ) District Judge: Honorable Mary A. McLaughlin Argued January 10, 2005 BEFORE: ROTH and CHERTOFF*, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI**, Chief Judge ORDER AMENDING OPINION ROTH, Circuit Judge IT IS ORDERED that the published Opinion in the above case filed January 10, 2006, be amended as follows: On page 5, line 11, "principle" should be "principal"; On page 11, line 15, “See Hays & Co. v. Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 885 F.2d 1149, 1156 (1989)" should be “See Hays & Co. v. Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 885 F.2d 1149, 1156 (3d. Cir. 1989)" By the Court, /s/ Jane R. Roth Circuit Judge Dated: January 18, 2006 *This case was submitted to the panel of Judges Roth, Chertoff and Restani. Judge Chertoff resigned after submission, but before the filing of the opinion. The decision is filed by a quorum of the panel. 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). **Honorable Jane A. Restani, Chief Judge, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.