Opinions of the United
2007 Decisions States Court of Appeals
for the Third Circuit
9-7-2007
Hartmann v. Carroll
Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential
Docket No. 04-4550
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007
Recommended Citation
"Hartmann v. Carroll" (2007). 2007 Decisions. Paper 349.
http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007/349
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2007 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 04-4550
DETLEF F. HARTMANN,
Appellant
v.
THOMAS CARROLL, Warden;
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF STATE OF DELAWARE
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Delaware
(D. C. No. 03-cv-00796)
District Judge: Hon. Joseph J. Farnan, Jr.
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
At the direction of the Court, the above captioned opinion is amended to correct a
typographical error on page 4 of the opinion as the correct statutory reference is 28 U.S.C.
§2254(b) rather than 28 U.S.C. §2244(b). The opinion is amended as follows:
Moreover, Congress, in enacting AEDPA, intended to further principles of
comity, finality, and federalism, which are promoted in large part through
the requirement, set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b), that state remedies be
exhausted before seeking federal review. Duncan v. Walker, 533 U.S. 167,
178 (2001); Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 420, 436 (2000).
For the Court,
/s/ Marcia M. Waldron
Clerk
Date: September 7, 2007
tmk/cc: David R. Fine, Esq.
Christopher R. Nestor, Esq.
Elizabeth R. McFarlan, Esq.