United States v. Hector Sanchez-Camacho

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 11 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-50108 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:08-CR-03533-WQH v. MEMORANDUM * HECTOR SANCHEZ-CAMACHO, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding Submitted December 15, 2009 ** Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges. Hector Sanchez-Camacho appeals from the 48-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). NC/Research States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Sanchez-Camacho contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable because the district court overstated the seriousness of his criminal history, and because the 16-level enhancement that was imposed pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(a) was triggered by a relatively minor and stale narcotics conviction. The record reflects that the district court properly considered Sanchez-Camacho’s individual circumstances and the required factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and that, under the totality of the circumstances, the sentence below the guidelines range is not substantively unreasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51-52 (2007); United States v. Autery, 555 F.3d 864, 877 (9th Cir. 2009). AFFIRMED. NC/Research 2 09-50108