United States v. Lira-Lira

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAN 26 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-10070 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. CR-07-00118-DCB v. MEMORANDUM * MARGARITO LIRA-LIRA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding Submitted January 11, 2010 ** Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Ninth Circuit Judges. Margarito Lira-Lira appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 72-month sentence imposed for possession with intent to distribute approximately 212 kilograms of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(vii). * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). DAT/Research Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Lira-Lira’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. DAT/Research 2 08-10070