United States v. Abraham Gutierrez

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 26 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-50080 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:03-cr-00460-RSWL v. MEMORANDUM * ABRAHAM FERREL GUTIERREZ, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Ronald S.W. Lew, District Judge, Presiding Submitted January 11, 2010 ** Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges. Abraham Ferrel Gutierrez appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). SZ/Research Gutierrez contends that the district court erred when it denied his motion for a sentence reduction, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The district court correctly determined that it did not have the authority to reduce Gutierrez’s sentence because Amendment 706 did not affect the applicable sentencing range. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c); see also United States v. Leniear, 574 F.3d 668, 674 (9th Cir. 2009). We reject Gutierrez’s contention that application of § 3582(c)(2) to the drug quantity in his case renders his Guidelines’ range mandatory. AFFIRMED. SZ/Research 2 09-50080