United States v. Tony Green

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 03 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-30270 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:98-cr-05067-BHS v. MEMORANDUM * TONY CARZELL GREEN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Benjamin H. Settle, District Judge, Presiding Submitted November 17, 2009 ** Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. Tony Carzell Green appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a reduction of sentence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). AK/Research Green contends that the district court erred in denying his motion for resentencing pursuant to the retroactive amendments to the crack cocaine Sentencing Guidelines. The district court did not err in denying the motion because Green was sentenced as a career offender pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. See United States v. Wesson, 583 F.3d 728, 731 (9th Cir. 2009). To the extent that Green argues that he is entitled to be resentenced under the advisory Guidelines pursuant to United States v. Hicks, 472 F.3d 1167 (9th Cir. 2007), this argument also lacks merit. U.S.S.G § 1B1.10 cmt. n.1(A) (2008); see also United States v. Leniear, 574 F.3d 668, 673-74 (9th Cir. 2009). AFFIRMED. AK/Research 2 08-30270