FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 22 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARIA DE JESUS FUENTES, No. 07-71997
Petitioner, Agency No. A096-351-265
v.
MEMORANDUM *
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 16, 2010 **
San Francisco, California
Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Maria De Jesus Fuentes, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for
review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals summarily affirming
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
jlf/Inventory
the immigration judge’s denial of her application for cancellation of removal due to
her failure to establish the requisite hardship to her United States citizen children.
Fuentes contends that the immigration judge violated her due process rights
when the IJ failed to address all the hardship factors cumulatively. We lack
jurisdiction to review the agency’s determination that petitioner failed to show
extreme hardship. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.
2003). In addition, we lack jurisdiction over petitioners’ contention that the BIA
failed to consider the cumulative impact of their hardship evidence because it is not
supported by the record and does not amount to a colorable constitutional claim.
See Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 975, 980 (9th Cir. 2009).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
jlf/Inventory 2 07-71997