FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 25 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LUIS FERNANDO IBARRA ARENAS; No. 07-70438
VERONICA SANDOVAL,
Agency Nos. A095-448-335
Petitioners, A095-448-336
v.
MEMORANDUM *
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 16, 2010 **
Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges
Luis Fernando Ibarra Arenas and his wife, Veronica Sandoval, petition for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’order dismissing an immigration
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NV/Research
judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their applications for cancellation of removal. We
dismiss the petition for review.
Petitioners contend the IJ applied the incorrect legal standard to their
cancellation of removal application by failing to consider all the hardship factors
cumulatively. The record belies this contention. Because the IJ applied the correct
legal standard, we lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s discretionary hardship
determination. See Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 975, 980 (9th Cir. 2009);
see also Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 891 (9th Cir. 2003).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
NV/Research 2 07-70438