United States v. Eligio Chavez-Montes

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 08 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-10118 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 1:01-CR-00492-HG v. MEMORANDUM * ELIGIO CHAVEZ-MONTES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Helen Gillmor, District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 16, 2010 ** Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Eligio Chavez-Montes appeals from the 18-month sentence imposed following revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). EF/Research 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Chavez-Montes contends that his sentence is unreasonable because the district court failed to consider the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and make an individualized assessment based on the facts of his case. The record indicates that the district court did not procedurally err, and that Chavez-Montes’ sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 991-93 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc); see also United States v. Simtob, 485 F.3d 1058, 1062-63 (9th Cir. 2007). AFFIRMED. EF/Research 2 09-10118