United States v. Arturo Villa-Hernandez

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 08 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-10318 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:07-cr-01300-JMR-JJM v. MEMORANDUM * ARTURO VILLA-HERNANDEZ, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona John M. Roll, Chief District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 16, 2010 ** Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Arturo Villa-Hernandez appeals from his 46-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). DRS/Research California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Villa-Hernandez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. The record discloses that the appellant pleaded guilty without a plea agreement. Accordingly, we remand to the district court for the limited purpose of correcting the judgment to delete the reference to a plea agreement and appeal waiver. The district court’s judgment is affirmed in all other respects. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct judgment. DRS/Research 2 08-10318