FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 26 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RIKI MUHAMMAD, No. 07-17201
Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. CV-06-01036-SMM
v.
MEMORANDUM *
WILLIAM WHITE; et al.,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Stephen M. McNamee, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2010 **
Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
William White is substituted for his predecessor, Dora Schriro, pursuant to
Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2).
Arizona state prisoner Riki Muhammad appeals from the district court’s
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
AK/Research
judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we vacate and remand.
Muhammad contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for providing
erroneous advice regarding the degree of intent that the state was required to prove
at trial. Muhammad states that his reliance on this erroneous advice led him to
reject a plea offer and this fact, coupled with the significant sentencing disparity, is
sufficient to demonstrate prejudice. Muhammad alleges facts which, if proven,
would entitle him to relief and, because he was never given a full and fair hearing
in state court, he is entitled to a hearing in district court. We vacate the district
court’s denial of the habeas petition and remand for an evidentiary hearing to
address the merits of Muhammad’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim. See
Houston v. Schomig, 533 F.3d 1076, 1083 (9th Cir. 2008).
VACATED; REMANDED FOR AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING.
AK/Research 2 07-17201