Case: 13-12550 Date Filed: 03/31/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-12550
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00056-CAR-CHW-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANTONIO BISHOP,
a.k.a. BG,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
________________________
(March 31, 2014)
Before TJOFLAT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
In United States v. Bishop, --- Fed.Appx. ----, 2014 WL 776460 (C.A.11
Case: 13-12550 Date Filed: 03/31/2014 Page: 2 of 2
(Ga.)), Antonio Bishop appealed the 24 months’ sentence the District Court
imposed in Case No. 3:05-cr-00036 (following the revocation of his supervised
release) consecutively to the 120 months’ sentence imposed in Case No. 3:11-cr-
00056 (charging Bishop with involvement in a drug trafficking conspiracy) on the
ground that the Government breached its plea agreement in Case No. 3:11-cr-
00056 to recommend that the District Court impose a concurrent sentence in Case
No. 3:05-cr-00036. We found no merit in the appeal and affirmed the 24 months’
sentence in Case No. 3:05-cr-00036.
Bishop now appeals the 120 months’ sentence he received in Case No. 3:11-
cr-00056, presenting the same argument—the Government breached the plea
agreement in failing to recommend concurrent sentences. For the reasons stated in
United States v. Bishop cited above, we find no merit in Bishop’s argument and
therefore affirm the District Court’s judgment.
AFFIRMED.
2
United States v. Antonio Bishop
Combined Opinion