Williams v. Alamedia

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KEITH LEE WILLIAMS,  No. 05-55604 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-03-00196-NM EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, Jr., Warden,  Central District of Respondent-Appellee. California, Los Angeles  ORDER Filed May 30, 2008 Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Carlos T. Bea, and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges. ORDER Upon receiving certification that Keith Lee Williams did not submit himself to California state authorities within the 60-day conditional period set forth in Williams v. Alameida, 511 F.3d 973, 974 (9th Cir. 2007), we now dismiss Wil- liams’s appeal pursuant to the fugitive disentitlement doctrine. The mandate shall issue forthwith. IT IS SO ORDERED. 6089 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.