August Parker v. Alberto Zavala

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 23 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AUGUST MARIE PARKER, No. 10-17033 Plaintiff-counter-defendant- D.C. No. 2:09-cv-00428-SRB 3rd-party-defendant - Appellee, v. MEMORANDUM * ALBERTO ZAVALA; et al., Third-party-defendants-cross- claimants - Appellants, and KIMBERLY ZAVALA, Third-party-defendant-cross- claimant, PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant-third-party- plaintiff. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding Submitted November 16, 2011 ** San Francisco, California Before: NOONAN and BEA, Circuit Judges, and WALTER, Senior District Judge.*** This is an appeal from a motion for summary judgment; the facts are not repeated as the parties are familiar with them. We are constrained to interpret 38 U.S.C. § 1970(a) of the Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance Act to require strict compliance with its provisions regarding the designation of beneficiaries. Prudential Ins. Co. v. Perez, 51 F.3d 197, 198–99 (9th Cir. 1995). At the time of the insured’s death, the Army had only August Marie Parker listed as a designated beneficiary on file in its records. Appellants proffered no evidence to establish a triable issue of fact as to another properly designated beneficiary, or that the designation of Parker was for some reason invalid. Marks v. United States, 578 F.2d 261, 263 (9th Cir. 1978). AFFIRMED. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Donald E. Walter, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Western Louisiana, sitting by designation.