[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-12560
NOVEMBER 22, 2011
Non-Argument Calendar
JOHN LEY
________________________ CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cv-00130-JRH-WLB
HARTLEY GIBBONS, JR.,
RICKEY A. LUMPKIN,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs-Appellants,
versus
COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
OF RICHMOND COUNTY,
JAMES F. THOMPSON,
individually and in his Former official
capacity as Interim Superintendent of
Richmond County Public Schools,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendants-Appellees.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
________________________
(November 22, 2011)
Before HULL, PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Hartley Gibbons, Jr., and Rickey A. Lumpkin appeal the summary judgment
against their complaints that they were demoted and denied promotions based on
race by the County Board of Education of Richmond County, Georgia, and former
superintendent James F. Thompson. 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983. The district court
ruled that Gibbons and Lumpkin failed to establish a prima facie case of racial
discrimination and that the Board provided legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons
to demote and deny promotions to Gibbons and Lumpkin. We affirm.
Gibbons and Lumpkin failed to establish a prima facie case that they were
demoted because of their race. Gibbons and Lumpkin were replaced as principals
at the Glenn Hills Middle School and Tubman Middle School by two other
African-American men, and neither Gibbons or Lumpkin submitted any evidence
to establish that the decision to replace them with a person of the same race “was a
pretextual device specifically designed to disguise an act of discrimination.”
Howard v. Roadway Exp., Inc., 726 F.2d 1529, 1535 (11th Cir. 1984); see
Edwards v. Wallace Cmty. Coll., 49 F.3d 1517, 1521 (11th Cir. 1995) (requiring
consideration of “whether the fact that a minority was hired overcomes the
inference of discrimination otherwise created by the evidence”). Gibbons and
2
Lumpkin testified that they were treated differently than principals who had school
performance and discipline issues, but Gibbons’ and Lumpkins’ schools were
being monitored by the state and were in danger of being closed for their repeated
failure to satisfy the No Child Left Behind Act.
Gibbons and Lumpkin also failed to establish a prima facie case that they
were denied promotions based on their race. See Davis v. Town of Lake Park, Fla.,
245 F.3d 1232, 1238 (11th Cir. 2001). After Gibbons and Lumpkin served one
year as assistant high school principals, they were appointed as principals at
Terrace Manor Elementary School and Wilkinson Gardens Elementary School. As
principals at these elementary schools, Gibbons and Lumpkin received the same
job titles, work responsibilities, and compensation as the principals at Gracewood
Elementary and Lake Forest Hills Elementary. Although there may have been
differences in the “prestige” and resources available at Gracewood and Lake
Forest, those differences do not establish that Gibbons and Lumpkin suffered “a
serious and material change in the terms, conditions, or privileges of [their]
employment” to constitute an adverse employment action. Id. at 1239 (emphasis
omitted).
We AFFIRM the summary judgment in favor of the Board.
3