United States v. Wilson

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-10647 FEB 28, 2011 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY CLERK ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:09-cr-00017-JES-DNF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIAM HAMILTON WILSON, Defendant-Appellant. __________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________ (February 28, 2011) Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Mark. G. Rodriguez, appointed counsel for William Hamilton Wilson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Wilson’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. 2