FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 12 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MOHMMED ENAMUL BHUIYAN No. 10-71697
HAQ,
Agency No. A071-575-736
Petitioner,
v. MEMORANDUM *
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 9, 2012 **
Before: RAWLINSON, MURGUIA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Mohmmed Enamul Bhuiyan Haq, a native and citizen of Bangladesh,
petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying
his motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. Holder,
597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Haq’s untimely motion to
reopen because he did not establish changed circumstances in Bangladesh material
to his claims to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time limit. See 8 C.F.R.
§ 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Almaraz v. Holder, 608 F.3d 638, 640-41 (9th Cir. 2010)
(petitioner failed to show passage of trade agreement was material to his claim
where documents he submitted were inconclusive, even if accepted as true).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
2 10-71697