Julio Hernandez v. Eric Holder, Jr.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OCT 21 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS JULIO CESAR HERNANDEZ, No. 11-72364 Petitioner, Agency No. A071-577-188 v. MEMORANDUM * ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted October 15, 2013 ** Before: FISHER, GOULD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges. Julio Cesar Hernandez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Hernandez’s motion to reopen because Hernandez did not show prima facie eligibility for relief. See INS v. Abudu, 485 U.S. 94, 104 (1988) (the BIA may deny a motion to reopen for failure to establish a prima facie case for the underlying relief sought); Singh v. INS, 134 F.3d 962, 967 (9th Cir. 1998) (“[m]ere generalized lawlessness and violence . . . generally is not sufficient” for asylum). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 2 11-72364