Thomas West v. Janice Brewer

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THOMAS PAUL WEST; GREGORY  DICKENS; CHARLES M. HEDLUND; ROBERT W. MURRAY; THEODORE WASHINGTON; TODD SMITH, Plaintiffs-Appellants, No. 11-16707 v. D.C. No. 2:11-cv-01409- JANICE K BREWER, Governor of Arizona; CHARLES L. RYAN,  NVW Director, Arizona Department of District of Arizona, Corrections; ERNEST TRUJILLO; Phoenix CARSON MCWILLIAMS, Warden, ORDER Arizona Department of Corrections- Florence; UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Does 1-50, Defendants-Appellees.  Filed July 18, 2011 Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judge and Capital Case Coordinator. ORDER Pursuant to the rules applicable to capital cases in which an execution date has been scheduled, a deadline was established by which any judge could request a vote on whether the panel’s order denying the Emergency Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order should be reheard en banc. No judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the panel’s decision en banc within the time period established. Therefore, the peti- tion for rehearing en banc is denied and en banc proceedings 9451 9452 WEST v. BREWER are concluded with respect to the Emergency Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order. The three-judge panel will issue a separate order concern- ing the petition for panel rehearing. Judges McKeown, Clif- ton, and Bea did not participate. Statement of REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: This is a brief explanation of why I am not calling for rehearing en banc. I consider such a call futile in light of the recent decisions of this court in Beaty v. Brewer, No. 11-99007, 2011 WL 2040916 (9th Cir. May 25, 2011), Cook v. Brewer, No. 11-15743, 2011 WL 1213095 (9th Cir. April 1, 2011), and Cook v. Brewer, 637 F.3d 1002 (9th Cir. 2011), decisions I believe to be clearly erroneous, as well as the Supreme Court’s decision in Baze v. Rees, 553 U.S. 35 (2008), a case on which it would be injudicious for me to comment. Thus, while I believe that West’s execution will violate the Constitution, I can play no further role in seeking to protect his constitutional rights.