Mittie Fleming DBA v. Subway Restaurant, 1309 Main St, LLC and Buscom Group, LLC

FILE COPY CHIEF JUSTICE LISA MATZ CAROLYN WRIGHT CLERK OF THE COURT (214) 712-3450 JUSTICES theclerk@5th.txcourts.gov DAVID L. BRIDGES MICHAEL J. O'NEILL GAYLE HUMPA KERRY P. FITZGERALD BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR MOLLY FRANCIS (214) 712-3434 DOUGLAS S. LANG gayle.humpa@5th.txcourts.gov ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS Court of Appeals ROBERT M. FILLMORE LANA MYERS Fifth District of Texas at Dallas FACSIMILE (214) 745-1083 DAVID EVANS 600 COMMERCE STREET, SUITE 200 DAVID LEWIS INTERNET ADA BROWN DALLAS, TEXAS 75202 HTTP://5TH.TXCOURTS.GOV CRAIG STODDART (214) 712-3400 October 06, 2014 Mittie Fleming PO Box 225603 Dallas, TX 75222 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * RE: Court of Appeals Number: 05-14-00321-CV Trial Court Case Number: DC-13-00683 Style: Mittie Fleming DBA v. Subway Restaurant, 1309 Main St, LLC and Buscom Group, LLC The appellant’s brief filed in the above referenced cause does not satisfy the requirements of Rule 38 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Specifically, the brief is deficient as follows: _____ It does not contain a complete list of all parties to the trial courts’ judgment or appealable order with the names and addresses of all trial and appellate counsel. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(a). _____ It does not contain a table of contents with references to the pages of the brief. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(b). __x__ The table of contents does not indicate the subject matter of each issue or point, or group of issues or points. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(b). _____ It does not contain an index of authorities arranged alphabetically and indicating the pages of the brief where the authorities are cited. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(c). FILE COPY __x__ It does not contain a concise statement of the case, the course of proceedings, and the trial court’s disposition of the case supported by record references. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(d). _____ It does not concisely state all issues or points presented for review. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(f). __x__ It does not contain a concise statement of the facts supported by record references. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(g). __x__ It does not contain a succinct, clear, and accurate statement of the arguments made in the body of the brief. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(h). _____ The argument does not contain appropriate citations to authorities. TEX R. APP. P. 38.1(i). __x__ The argument does not contain appropriate citations to the record. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(i). _____ It does not contain a short conclusion that clearly states the nature of the relief sought. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(j). _____ Text of brief is not double spaced. TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(d). _____ Text of brief is not proper size. TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(e). _____ It does not contain a proper certificate of service. TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5(e)(2)(3). _____ Documents in appendix must be redacted to remove name of child. TEX. R. APP. P. 9.8(b). _____ Documents in appendix must be redacted to remove name of parent. TEX. R. APP. P. 9.8(b). __x__ One or more of the following is omitted from the appendix. Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(k). __x__ The trial court’s judgment. Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(k)(1)(A). __x__ The jury charge and verdict, if any, or the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, if any. Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(k)(1)(B). __x__ The text of any rule, regulation, ordinance, statute, constitutional provision, or other law (excluding case law) on which the argument is based. Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(k)(1)(C). __x__ The text of any contract or other document that is central to the argument. Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(k)(1)(C). 2 FILE COPY __x__ Failure to file an amended brief that compiles with the Texas Rules of Appeallate Procedure within 10 days of the date of this letter may result in dismissal of this appeal without further notice from the Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b),(c) Respectfully, /s/ Lisa Matz, Clerk of the Court cc: Dan D. McClain (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL) 3