Order entered October 29, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-14-00836-CR
No. 05-14-00837-CR
No. 05-14-00838-CR
MATTHEW LOUIS REESE, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. F14-00306-P, F13-60347-P, F13-00723-P
ORDER
Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Fillmore and Evans
On August 7, 2014, the Court dismissed these appeals for want of jurisdiction because the
trial court certified the cases involved plea bargains and appellant did not have the right to
appeal. The Court now has before it appellant’s motion for rehearing in which appellant asserts
the trial court told appellant he would be allowed to appeal the order cumulating the sentences.
Appellant had filed an excerpt of the June 19, 2014 hearing at which the trial judge said the
stacking orders were not part of the plea agreement and, therefore, appellant could appeal them.
We note that appellant is represented by the same counsel on appeal as he was at trial, and
counsel did not obtain amended certifications of appellant’s right to appeal that reflect the trial
court’s statement about the order stacking the sentences. In our order granting the extension of
time to file the motion for rehearing, we notified the State that its response was due within ten
days. The State did not respond.
Accordingly, we GRANT the motion for rehearing. We WITHDRAW our opinion and
VACATE our judgment of August 7, 2014. We REINSTATE the appeals as follows.
We ORDER the trial court to make findings regarding:
Whether, despite the plea agreements, the trial court granted appellant the right to
appeal these cases. If the trial court finds that appellant was not granted the right
to appeal the cases, it shall make a finding to that effect.
If the trial court finds that appellant was granted the right to appeal the cases, the
trial court shall make a finding as to scope of that right to appeal. Further , the
trial court shall prepare amended certifications of appellant’s right to appeal that
specifically identifies the scope of appellant’s right to appeal the cases. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 25.2(a), (d); Cortez v. State, 420 S.W.3d 803 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013).
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record containing its written findings of fact, any
supporting documentation, and any orders to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of
this order. We further ORDER that if the trial court finds appellant has the right to appeal, the
supplemental record must contain the trial court’s amended certifications of appellant’s right to
appeal that accurately reflect the scope of appellant’s right to appeal these cases.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the
Honorable Teresa Hawthorne, Presiding Judge, 203rd Judicial District Court; Allan Fishburn;
and Michael Casillas, Dallas County District Attorney’s Office.
We ABATE the appeals to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeals
shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received.
/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT
CHIEF JUSTICE