Affirmed as Modified and Opinion Filed October 21, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-13-00874-CR
DAMON JAMES WILSON, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F13-30651-U
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Myers and Evans
Opinion by Chief Justice Wright
Damon James Wilson appeals from his conviction for assault involving family violence,
with a prior assault-family violence conviction. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.01(a)(1) (West
2011); TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. §§ 71.0021, 71.005 (West 2008 & Supp. 2014). The trial court
assessed punishment, enhanced by one prior felony conviction, at eighteen years’ imprisonment
and a $2,000 fine. In a single issue, appellant contends the trial court’s judgment should be
modified to reflect the correct statute for the charged offense. The State agrees the judgment
should be modified as appellant requests. We modify the trial court’s judgment and affirm as
modified.
The trial court’s judgment incorrectly identifies the statute for the offense as “22.02 Penal
Code.” Appellant was convicted of assault involving family violence, with a prior conviction for
assault-family violence under section 22.01 of the Texas Penal Code. See TEX. PENAL CODE
ANN. § 22.01(a)(1), (b)(2) (West 2011). Thus, the judgment is incorrect. We sustain appellant’s
sole issue.
We further note the judgment incorrectly shows the plea to the first enhancement
paragraph and the finding on the first enhancement paragraph as “N/A.” The record shows
appellant pleaded true to the enhancement paragraph and the trial court found the enhancement
paragraph true.
We modify the judgment to show (1) the statute for the offense is “22.01(a)(1) Penal
Code,” (2) the plea to the first enhancement paragraph is “true,” and (3) the findings on the first
enhancement paragraph is “true.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(b); Bigley v. State, 865 S.W.2d 26,
27–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Asberry v. State, 813 S.W.2d 526, 529–30 (Tex. App.—Dallas
1991, pet. ref’d).
As modified, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
130874F.U05
/Carolyn Wright/
CAROLYN WRIGHT
CHIEF JUSTICE
‐2‐
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
DAMON JAMES WILSON, Appellant Appeal from the 291st Judicial District
Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
No. 05-13-00874-CR V. F13-30651-U).
Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright,
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Myers and Evans participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is MODIFIED as
follows:
The section entitled “Statute for Offense” is modified to show “22.01(a)(1) Penal Code.”
The section entitled “Plea to 1st Enhancement Paragraph” is modified to show “True.”
The section entitled “Findings on 1st Enhancement Paragraph” is modified to show
“True.”
As modified, we AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment.
Judgment entered October 21, 2014
‐3‐