Affirmed and Opinion Filed September 11, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-13-00592-CR
JESUS GUTIERREZ ELIASAR, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F13-00153-Y
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Bridges, Lang, and Evans
Opinion by Justice Bridges
Jesus Gutierrez Eliasar pleaded guilty before a jury to murder. The jury found appellant
guilty and assessed punishment at sixty-five years’ imprisonment and a $10,000 fine. See TEX.
PENAL CODE ANN. § 19.02(b) (West 2011). On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which
she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the
requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional
evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See
High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a
copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he
did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 2014 WL 2865901 (Tex. Crim. App. June 25,
2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases).
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,
826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree
the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably
support the appeal.
We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
130592F.U05
/David L. Bridges/
DAVID L. BRIDGES
JUSTICE
‐2‐
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
JESUS GUTIERREZ ELIASAR, Appeal from the Criminal District Court
Appellant No. 7 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
F13-00153-Y.
No. 05-13-00592-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges,
Justices Lang and Evans participating.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered September 11, 2014
‐3‐