In The
Court of Appeals
Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-14-00368-CR
ALBERTO RUIZ, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 69th District Court
Moore County, Texas
Trial Court No. 4976, Honorable Ron Enns, Presiding
March 4, 2015
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
Before the court is a motion for voluntary dismissal, filed by counsel for appellant
Alberto Ruiz. In its certification of appellant’s right of appeal pursuant to appellate rule
25.2(a)(2), the trial court stated that appellant’s case was a plea-bargain case and
appellant had no right of appeal. By letter of February 26, 2015, we notified counsel
that unless an amended certificate indicating appellant had the right of appeal was filed
by March 17, the appeal would be dismissed.
The motion for voluntary dismissal is signed only by appellant’s counsel. The
motion states appellant was deported, remains outside the United States and thus is
unable to sign the motion for voluntary dismissal, as required by appellate rule 42.2(a).
In the motion, counsel acknowledges that appellant is unable to obtain a certification he
has a right of appeal.
The motion continues by stating that since involuntary dismissal is imminent
under rule 25.2(d), counsel requests for purposes of expediency that we invoke
appellate rule 2, suspend rule 42.2(a)’s requirement that appellant sign the motion, and
dismiss the appeal.
The requirement that the appellant in a criminal case sign a motion for voluntary
dismissal of the appeal is expressly stated in the rules that govern our practice, and we
do not lightly suspend it. We decline to do so in this case. The motion before us gives
no indication appellant is aware of its filing or authorizes dismissal of his appeal. We
therefore deny the motion for voluntary dismissal.
However, because appellant has not obtained an amended certificate indicating
a right of appeal, and has acknowledged his inability to do so, we will dismiss the
appeal under appellate rule 25.2(d). See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d) (“The appeal must be
dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not
been made part of the record under these rules”); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675,
680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain
whether an appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2),
must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the
2
appeal”); TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f) (a court of appeals may render judgment dismissing the
appeal). For that reason, the appeal is dismissed.
James T. Campbell
Justice
Do not publish.
3