IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-15-00027-CR
JIMMY DARRELL CRAIG, JR.,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
From the 220th District Court
Hamilton County, Texas
Trial Court No. CR07994
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant filed what appeared to be a pro se interlocutory notice of appeal of the
trial court’s denial of his motion for bond reduction. The Clerk of the Court notified
Appellant that this case was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction and that the
Court might dismiss his appeal unless he showed grounds for continuing it. Appellant
did not respond to the Clerk’s letter.
This Court lacks jurisdiction over a trial court‘s denial of a motion for bond
reduction when the appeal is not from the trial court’s denial of a pretrial application
for writ of habeas corpus in which the appellant sought bond reduction. See Benford v.
State, 994 S.W.2d 404, 409 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, no pet.); see also Sanchez v. State, 340
S.W.3d 848, 849 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2011, no pet.). Accordingly, this appeal is
dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
REX D. DAVIS
Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Davis, and
Justice Scoggins
Appeal dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed February 26, 2015
Do not publish
[CR25]
Craig v. State Page 2