IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-13-00409-CR
ADAM LAMAR BROOKS,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
From the County Court at Law No. 1
Brazos County, Texas
Trial Court No. 11-01734-CRM-CCL1
ORDER
Adam Lamar Brooks was convicted of indecent exposure and sentenced to 120
days in jail with a $1,000 fine. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 21.08 (West 2011). Brooks
filed a motion to suppress his statements in which he generally contended he did not
voluntarily make any statements to police. After two hearings, the motion to suppress
was denied. Brooks requested findings of fact and conclusions of law, but none were
made.
The Court of Criminal Appeals has said, “Under article 38.22 of the Texas Code
of Criminal Procedure, ‘[i]n all cases where a question is raised as to the voluntariness
of a statement of an accused, the [trial] court ... must enter an order stating its
conclusion as to whether or not the statement was voluntarily made, along with the
specific finding of fact upon which the conclusion was based, which order shall be filed
among the papers of this cause.’” Vasquez v. State, 411 S.W.3d 918, 920 (Tex. Crim. App.
2013) (quoting art. 38.22, sec. 6). In Vasquez, the Court held that “written findings are
required in all cases concerning voluntariness. The statute has no exceptions.” Id.
Accordingly, this appeal is abated to the trial court to make findings of fact and
conclusions of law regarding whether Brooks’ statements were voluntary. The trial
court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law must be prepared, signed, and filed as a
supplemental clerk’s record with this Court within 28 days from the date of this Order.
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Davis, and
Justice Scoggins
Appeal abated
Order issued and filed January 29, 2015
Brooks v. State Page 2