COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS
§
ARMANDO LUNA, JR., No. 08-14-00037-CR
§
Appellant, Appeal from
§
v. Criminal District Court No. 5
§
THE STATE OF TEXAS, of Dallas County, Texas
§
Appellee. (TC # F-1162422-L)
§
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Armando Luna, Jr. appeals his conviction of kidnapping, enhanced with a prior felony
conviction. Following a contested hearing on the State’s motion to proceed with adjudication of
guilt, the trial court found that Appellant had violated the terms and conditions of deferred
adjudication community supervision and granted the State’s motion. The trial court adjudicated
Appellant guilty and assessed his punishment at imprisonment for twenty years. We affirm.
FRIVOLOUS APPEAL
Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which he has concluded that the
appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct.
2094, 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967), by advancing contentions which counsel says might arguably
support the appeal. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. State,
516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974); Pena v. State, 932 S.W.2d 31 (Tex.App.--El Paso 1995,
no pet.). A copy of counsel’s brief has been delivered to Appellant, and Appellant has been
advised of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. Appellant has not
filed a pro se brief.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief, and agree that the appeal is
wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably
support the appeal. The judgment is affirmed.
February 13, 2015
ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice
Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, J., and Barajas, C.J., (Senior Judge)
(Barajas, C.J., Senior Judge, sitting by assignment, not participating)
(Do Not Publish)
-2-