AFFIRMED as Modified; Opinion Filed July 30, 2014.
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-14-00106-CR
No. 05-14-00107-CR
ZEFERINO LABORICO, JR., Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. F10-25511-R, F10-25512-R
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Fillmore, Evans, and Lewis
Opinion by Justice Evans
Zeferino Laborico, Jr. appeals from the adjudicating of his guilt for aggravated sexual
assault of a child and indecency with a child. In two issues, appellant contends the trial court’s
judgments should be modified to show there were no plea bargain agreements in these cases.
The State agrees the judgments should be modified as appellant asks. We modify the trial
court’s judgments adjudicating guilt and affirm as modified.
Appellant waived a jury and pleaded guilty to aggravated sexual assault of a child
younger than fourteen years and indecency with a child. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN.
§§ 21.11(a)(1), 22.021(a)(B) (West 2011 & Supp. 2013). In the indecency case, appellant also
pleaded true to one enhancement paragraph alleging a prior felony conviction. Pursuant to plea
agreements, the trial court deferred adjudicating guilt, placed appellant on five years’ community
supervision, and assessed a $1,500 fine in each case. The State moved to adjudicate guilt,
alleging appellant violated the conditions of community supervision. In a hearing on the
motions, appellant rejected a plea agreement from the State, pleaded true to the allegations in a
hearing on the motions, and asked the trial court to continue his community supervision. The
trial court found the allegations true, adjudicated appellant guilty in each case, and assessed
punishment at twenty-five years’ imprisonment on the aggravated sexual assault of a child
conviction and fifteen years’ imprisonment on the indecency with a child conviction.
The judgment in each case states there were terms of a plea bargain agreement. Thus, the
judgments are incorrect. We sustain appellant’s two issues.
We modify the judgments adjudicating guilt to show the terms of plea bargain were
“open.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(b); Bigley v. State, 865 S.W.2d 26, 27–28 (Tex. Crim. App.
1993); Asberry v. State, 813 S.W.2d 526, 529–30 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1991, pet. ref’d). As
modified, we affirm the trial court’s judgments.
/ David Evans/
DAVID EVANS
JUSTICE
Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
140106F.U05
-2-
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
ZEFERINO LABORICO, JR., Appellant Appeal from the 265th Judicial District
Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
No. 05-14-00106-CR V. F10-25511-R).
Opinion delivered by Justice Evans,
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Fillmore and Lewis participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt is
MODIFIED as follows:
The section entitled “Terms of Plea Bargain” is modified to show “Open.”
As modified, we AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt.
Judgment entered July 30, 2014.
-3-
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
ZEFERINO LABORICO, JR., Appellant Appeal from the 265th Judicial District
Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
No. 05-14-00107-CR V. F10-25512-R).
Opinion delivered by Justice Evans,
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Fillmore and Lewis participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt is
MODIFIED as follows:
The section entitled “Terms of Plea Bargain” is modified to show “Open.”
As modified, we AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt.
Judgment entered July 30, 2014.
-4-