Jamal Dawson Conner v. State

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-13-00259-CR ____________________ JAMAL DAWSON CONNER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________ On Appeal from the Criminal District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 10-09185 ________________________________________________________ _____________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Jamal Dawson Conner pleaded guilty under a plea agreement to the offense of assault on a public servant. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.01(a)(1), (b) (West Supp. 2013). The trial court assessed punishment at ten years of confinement, suspended the imposition of confinement, placed Conner on community supervision for five years, and imposed a $500 fine. After the State filed a motion 1 to revoke, the trial court found Conner violated terms of the community supervision, revoked the supervision, and sentenced him to eight years in prison. Appellant’s counsel filed a brief that presents counsel’s professional evaluation of the record. Counsel concludes there are no arguable points of error. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). This Court granted an extension of time for appellant to file a pro se response. We received no response from appellant. We have reviewed the appellate record and agree with counsel’s conclusion. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). It is unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. See Bledsoe, 178 S.W.3d at 826-28; compare Stafford, 813 S.W.2d at 511. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. AFFIRMED. _________________________ LEANNE JOHNSON Justice Submitted on April 1, 2014 Opinion Delivered May 7, 2014 Do Not Publish Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ. 2