Trinidad George Perez v. State

NUMBER 13-15-00141-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ TRINIDAD GEORGE PEREZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the 24th District Court of Victoria County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Trinidad George Perez, appeals from a denial of his motion for DNA testing. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. The record before this court reflects that the trial court signed the order denying motion for post-conviction DNA testing on September 25, 2014, and that appellant filed his pro se notice of appeal on November 10, 2014. On March 30, 2015, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it appeared that the appeal was not timely perfected. The Clerk further advised appellant that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of the Court’s directive. Appellant has not responded to the Court’s notice. An appeal from a denial of a motion for DNA testing is treated in the same manner as an appeal of any other criminal matter. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 64.05 (Vernon Supp. 2005). Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2 provides that an appeal is perfected when notice of appeal is filed within thirty days after the day the trial court enters an appealable order. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). The time within which to file the notice may be enlarged if, within fifteen days after the deadline for filing the notice, the party files the notice of appeal and a motion complying with Rule 10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Appellant’s notice of appeal was due to have been filed on or before October 27, 2015.1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(2). Although the notice of appeal herein was filed within the fifteen day time period, no such motion for extension of time was filed within the fifteen day time period. See id. 26.2(a)(2). This Court's appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a timely filed notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Absent a timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address 1 Because the thirtieth day fell on a Saturday, appellant had until the following Monday, October 27, 2014 to file the notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1. 2 the merits of the appeal in a criminal case and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; however, the availability of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3(a) (Vernon 2005); see also Ex parte Garcia, 988 S.W.2d 240 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. PER CURIAM Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Delivered and filed the 30th day of April, 2015. 3