In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
___________________
NO. 09-14-00141-CR
___________________
IN RE HEYMAN HAROLD GUILLORY
__________________________________________________________________
Original Proceeding
__________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Heyman Harold Guillory filed a petition for writ of mandamus, in
which he complains that after pleading guilty, he filed a request for DNA testing
with the trial court pursuant to Chapter 64 of the Texas Code of Criminal
Procedure, but the trial court failed to rule on his motion. To obtain mandamus
relief for the trial court’s refusal to rule on a motion, a relator must establish: “(1)
the motion was properly filed and has been pending for a reasonable time; (2) the
relator requested a ruling on the motion; and (3) the trial court refused to rule.” In
re Sarkissian, 243 S.W.3d 860, 861 (Tex. App.—Waco 2008, orig. proceeding).
Merely filing a motion with a trial court does not constitute a request for the trial
court to rule on the motion. Id.
1
Guillory provided a copy of his motion and the State’s response; however,
his petition for writ of mandamus and the documents provided do not demonstrate
that he requested a ruling on his motion and that the trial court refused to rule. We
conclude that Guillory has not shown that the trial court failed to act on a properly
filed motion. See id. Accordingly, we deny mandamus relief.
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Opinion Delivered April 16, 2014
Do Not Publish
Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
2