In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
_________________
NO. 09-13-00457-CR
_________________
DAVID EARL SEGURA, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
________________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 252nd District Court
Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 12-14198
________________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant David Earl Segura entered a
plea of guilty to the offense of aggravated robbery. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §
29.03(a)(3)(A) (West 2011). The trial court found the evidence sufficient to find
Segura guilty, but deferred finding him guilty. The trial court placed Segura on
community supervision for ten years and assessed a fine of $1,000. The State
subsequently filed a motion to revoke Segura’s community supervision. Segura
pled “true” to violating a condition of his community supervision. After a hearing
on the State’s motion to revoke, the trial court found that Segura violated a
condition of his community supervision order, found Segura guilty of aggravated
1
robbery, revoked Segura’s unadjudicated community supervision, and imposed a
sentence of thirty-five years of confinement.
Segura’s appellate counsel filed an Anders brief. See Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
Counsel’s brief presents his professional evaluation of the record and concludes
there are no arguable grounds to be advanced in this appeal. Counsel provided
Segura with a copy of this brief. We granted an extension of time for appellant to
file a pro se brief. We received no response from Segura.
We have independently reviewed the clerk’s record and the reporter’s
record, and we agree with Segura’s appellate counsel that no arguable issues
support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new
counsel to re-brief Segura’s appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503,
511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court’s judgment.1
AFFIRMED.
______________________________
CHARLES KREGER
Justice
Submitted on April 1, 2014
Opinion Delivered April 9, 2014
Do not publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger, and Johnson, JJ.
1
Segura may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for
discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
2