In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
_________________
NO. 09-13-00490-CV
_________________
IN RE JOHN S. MORGAN AND JOHN S. MORGAN, P.C., D/B/A
MORGAN LAW FIRM
________________________________________________________________________
Original Proceeding
________________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In a petition for writ of mandamus, John S. Morgan and John S. Morgan,
P.C., d/b/a Morgan Law Firm, seek to compel the trial court to vacate its order of
August 30, 2013, which denied Relators’ motion to disqualify counsel for the real
parties in interest. The record submitted with the petition consists of documents
concerning other cases, correspondence discussing settlement negotiations, the
motion and supplemental motion Relators filed with the trial court, and the trial
court’s order. The mandamus record does not contain the parties’ live pleadings or
the response filed by the real parties in interest, Harris, Duesler & Hatfield, L.L.P.,
1
James Harris, Jr., and Collin Cobb. Relators have not presented a mandamus
record that includes a copy of all documents material to their claim, which asserts
that the real parties in interest must be disqualified. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a);
see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k). After reviewing the mandamus petition and
record, we conclude that Relators have not established the trial court clearly abused
its discretion. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Opinion Delivered November 14, 2013
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
2