Opinion filed June 26, 2014
In The
Eleventh Court of Appeals
__________
No. 11-12-00129-CV
__________
MICHELLE DIMMITT, Appellant
V.
BROOKSHIRE GROCERY COMPANY D/B/A BROOKSHIRE’S
AND SUPERIOR SANITATION, INC., Appellees
On Appeal from the 220th District Court
Comanche County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. CCCV-10-14910
CONCURRING MEMORANDUM OPINION
A wet floor is a wet floor. Insofar as the majority holds that the “wet floor”
cone did not adequately warn of a different kind of wet floor, I disagree. However,
because I believe that the summary judgment evidence raises an issue of material
fact as to whether the cone was in sufficient proximity to the place where Dimmitt
fell so as to constitute an adequate warning, I concur in the result.
June 26, 2014 MIKE WILLSON
Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., JUSTICE
Willson, J., and Bailey, J.