Agua Special Utility District v. Basilisa Perez Gonzalez, Rosalva Sosa, Raquel G. Chatriwala, Rogelio Gonzales, Rolando Gonzalez, Rebecca G. Ramirez, Ramon Gonzalez III, Roel Gonzalez, Ricardo Gonzalez and Heirs and Unknown Heirs, Assigns or Devisees of Ramon Gonzalez
NUMBER 13-14-00593-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________
AGUA SPECIAL UTILITY DISTRICT, Appellant,
v.
BASILISA PEREZ GONZALEZ, ROSALVA SOSA,
RAQUEL G. CHATRIWALA, ROGELIO GONZALES,
ROLANDO GONZALEZ, REBECCA G. RAMIREZ,
RAMON GONZALEZ III, ROEL GONZALEZ,
RICARDO GONZALEZ AND HEIRS AND UNKNOWN HEIRS,
ASSIGNS OR DEVISEES OF RAMON GONZALEZ, Appellees.
____________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 8
of Hidalgo County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant filed an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No.
8 of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number CCD-0125-H. Appellant has filed an
amended motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds it no longer wishes to pursue the
appeal. The certificate of conference reflects that appellant was unable to confer with
appellees because appellant does not have a valid phone number or electronic mail
address or facsimile number for appellees.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s motion to
dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby
DISMISSED. There being no agreement in the motion regarding costs, pursuant to Rule
42.1(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, all costs are taxed against appellant.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs
against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion
for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the
12th day of February, 2015.
2