In The
Court of Appeals
Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-13-00191-CV
IN RE: ANASTACIO VASQUEZ, RELATOR
September 3, 2013
ON ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
Pending before the court is Anastacio Vasquez’ application for writ of mandamus
to compel the “Hon. Judge Green to rule on his Due Course of Law Complaint.” We
deny the application. 1
Relator has not filed a record or an appendix with his application. In an original
mandamus proceeding, the petition must be accompanied by a certified or sworn copy
of every document that is material to a relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any
underlying proceeding. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a)(1). Furthermore, a relator’s burden
on mandamus includes meeting the requirement that “[e]very statement of fact in the
petition [is] supported by citation to competent evidence included in the appendix or
1
On June 21, 2013, this court requested the respondent to file a response to relator’s application
by July 15, 2013. To date, respondent has not filed a response with this court.
record.” TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(g). In short, a relator must supply a record sufficient to
establish the right to mandamus relief. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex.
1992). Relator has not done so, therefore, we are unable to determine whether he is
entitled to mandamus relief.
Accordingly, we deny the application for a writ of mandamus.
Per Curiam
2