IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-13-00117-CR
IN RE MICHAEL JON BAILEY
Original Proceeding
ORDER
Michael Jon Bailey filed a petition for writ of prohibition in this Court on April
16, 2013. We dismissed his petition on May 2, 2013. See In re Bailey, No. 10-13-00117-
CR, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 5539 (Tex. App.—Waco May 2, 3013, orig. proceeding).
Bailey has now filed a document entitled, “Motion for Judicial Review and for
Material Facts Findings and Conclusions of Law.” In this document, he complains that
the Court dismissed his motion to proceed “informa pauperis,” that is, without the
advance payment of cost, as “moot.” Whether Bailey could proceed without the
advance payment of cost is moot because there is no relief we can grant Bailey because
there are no appellate filing fees to be paid in this criminal proceeding. We cannot
grant an exemption from filing fees that are not owed. Further, we have dismissed this
proceeding explaining why we have no jurisdiction. See In re Bailey, No. 10-13-00117-
CR, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 5539 (Tex. App.—Waco May 2, 3013, orig. proceeding).
Likewise, we dismiss his Motion for Judicial Review and for Material Facts Findings
and Conclusions of Law.
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Davis, and
Justice Scoggins
Motion dismissed
Order issued and filed May 23, 2013
In re Bailey Page 2