In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
____________________
NO. 09-12-00359-CR
____________________
ANTHONY DENARD MAYO, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
_______________________________________________________ ______________
On Appeal from the 252nd District Court
Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 06-99019
________________________________________________________ _____________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Anthony Denard Mayo pleaded guilty under a plea agreement to robbery.
The trial court deferred further proceedings, placed Mayo on community
supervision for six years, and assessed a $750.00 fine. After the State filed a
motion to revoke, the trial court found Mayo violated one of the terms of his
community supervision, adjudicated him guilty of robbery, and assessed
punishment at twenty years in prison, along with a $10,000 fine.
1
Mayo’s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel’s professional
evaluation of the record. Counsel concludes there are no arguable points of error.
See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967);
High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). This Court granted an
extension of time for Mayo to file a pro se response. We received no response
from Mayo. We have reviewed the appellate record and agree with counsel’s
conclusion. It is unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the
appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).
The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
________________________________
DAVID GAULTNEY
Justice
Submitted on March 5, 2013
Opinion Delivered March 27, 2013
Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.
2