Rodney Dale Hunt v. State

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ___________________ NO. 09-12-00488-CR NO. 09-12-00489-CR ___________________ RODNEY DALE HUNT, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee __________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 252nd District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause Nos. 10-09996, 10-09998 __________________________________________________________________ ORDER On March 6, 2013, appellant’s appointed counsel filed motions to withdraw and briefs which urge this Court to review these appeals pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). See In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 408-09 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). Counsel certified service of the motions to withdraw and the briefs on the appellant. Counsel states that he provided appellant with copies of the clerk’s records and the reporter’s 1 records and notified appellant of his right to review the records and file pro se briefs. It is, therefore, ORDERED that appellant, Rodney Dale Hunt, be given 60 days from the date hereof to file a pro se brief. It is, further, ORDERED that the State may file a reply brief, due 30 days from the date appellant files his brief, or if no brief is filed by appellant, 70 days from the date hereof. It is further ORDERED that counsel for appellant advise appellant of his right to seek discretionary review under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 68. See Tex. R. App. P. 48.4; see also Tex. R. App. P. 68. ORDER ENTERED March 21, 2013. PER CURIAM Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ. 2