In The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-12-00088-CR
JAMIE LEE COKER, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 188th District Court
Gregg County, Texas
Trial Court No. 32988-A
Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Jamie Lee Coker appeals from his conviction of intoxication assault and sentence of ten
years’ imprisonment. Coker has filed a single brief, in which he raises issues common to all of
his appeals. 1 He argues that (1) the waiver of his right to a jury trial and the stipulations of
evidence entered by him were involuntary, (2) the trial court erred in failing to reinstate the right
to a jury trial and in allowing the use of his stipulations of evidence, and (3) the trial court erred
in admitting “various State’s exhibits” over objections to their admissibility, including hearsay,
Confrontation Clause, Fifth Amendment, and Texas Code of Criminal Appeals Article 33.22
objections.
We addressed these issues in detail in our opinion of this date on Coker’s appeal in cause
number 06-12-00084-CR. For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude that error has
not been shown in this case.
We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Josh R. Morriss, III
Chief Justice
Date Submitted: June 18, 2013
Date Decided: June 19, 2013
Do Not Publish
1
Coker also appeals two convictions of intoxication manslaughter, one resulting in a sentence of twenty years’
imprisonment in our cause number 06-12-00084-CR, the other resulting in thirty years’ imprisonment in our cause
number 06-12-00085-CR, and two other convictions for intoxication assault, each resulting in sentences of ten
years’ imprisonment in our cause numbers 06-12-00086-CR and 06-12-00087-CR.
2