Opinion filed February 28, 2013
In The
Eleventh Court of Appeals
__________
No. 11-12-00314-CV
__________
PROSPECTA ENERGY GROUP, INC., Appellant
V.
RAY PRICHARD D/B/A RAYDER OILFIELD SERVICES, INC., Appellee
On Appeal from the 42nd District Court
Coleman County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 5347
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Prospecta Energy Group, Inc. is the appellant in this appeal. It has filed an unopposed
motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). In the motion, Appellant
states that the parties have “settled and resolved all differences between one another arising out
of the judgment rendered in the trial court.” Appellant asks this court to dismiss the appeal.
Therefore, in accordance with Appellant’s request, we dismiss the appeal.
Appellant additionally asks this court to affirm the appealed judgment of the trial court in
addition to dismissing the appeal. We are unable to grant this relief. Rule 42.1(a)(1) authorizes
the court as follows: “In accordance with a motion of appellant, the court may dismiss the appeal
or affirm the appealed judgment” (emphasis added). See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(a), (e), (f) (also
containing disjunctive language in discussing the types of judgments that courts of appeals may
issue).
The motion to dismiss is granted in part, and the appeal is dismissed.
PER CURIAM
February 28, 2013
Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,
McCall, J., and Willson, J.
2