Opinion filed December 21, 2012
In The
Eleventh Court of Appeals
__________
No. 11-12-00196-CR
__________
KYNYATTA DENISE BULLARD, Appellant
V.
STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 264th District Court
Bell County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 67004
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Kynyatta Denise Bullard pleaded guilty in February 2011 to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. The trial court deferred a finding of guilt and placed her on deferred adjudication community supervision for a term of six years. In August 2011, the State filed a motion to proceed with an adjudication of guilt, alleging multiple violations of the terms and conditions of community supervision. The trial court heard the motion to proceed on February 17, 2012. Appellant pleaded “true” to several of the alleged violations. Upon receiving evidence, the trial court found approximately seventeen alleged violations to be true, adjudicated appellant guilty of the charged offense, and assessed her punishment at confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for a term of four years. We dismiss the appeal.
Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw. The motion is supported by a brief in which counsel professionally and conscientiously examines the record and applicable law and states that he has concluded that the appeal is frivolous. Counsel has provided appellant with a copy of the brief and advised appellant of her right to review the record and file a response to counsel’s brief. A response has not been filed.[1] Court-appointed counsel has complied with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969); and Eaden v. State, 161 S.W.3d 173 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2005, no pet.).
Following the procedures outlined in Anders and Schulman, we have independently re-viewed the record, and we agree that the appeal is without merit and should be dismissed. Schulman, 252 S.W.3d at 409. In this regard, a plea of true standing alone is sufficient to support a trial court’s decision to revoke community supervision and proceed with an adjudication of guilt. See Moses v. State, 590 S.W.2d 469, 470 (Tex. Crim. App. 1979).
We note that counsel has the responsibility to advise appellant that she may file a petition for discretionary review with the clerk of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals seeking review by that court. Tex. R. App. P. 48.4 (“In criminal cases, the attorney representing the defendant on appeal shall, within five days after the opinion is handed down, send his client a copy of the opinion and judgment, along with notification of the defendant’s right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review under Rule 68.”). Likewise, this court advises appellant that she may file a petition for discretionary review pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 68.
The motion to withdraw is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.
December 21, 2012 PER CURIAM
Do not publish. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,
McCall, J., and Willson, J.
[1]By letter, this court granted appellant thirty days in which to exercise her right to file a response to counsel’s brief.