NUMBER 13-14-00276-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
James Young, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee.
On appeal from the 130th District Court
of Matagorda County, Texas.
ORDER
Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes
Order Per Curiam
Appellant, James Young, has filed a notice of appeal with this Court from his
conviction in trial court cause number 11-073. The trial court’s certification of the
defendant’s right to appeal shows that the defendant does not have the right to appeal.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an
appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that a defendant has a right of
appeal is not made a part of the record. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P.
37.1, 44.3, 44.4.
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has held that a trial counsel’s duties do not
end upon sentencing, but rather, include advising a client concerning the right to appeal
and “taking other steps to pursue an appeal.” See Jones v. State, 98 S.W.3d 700, 703
(Tex. Crim. App. 2003).
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, appellant’s lead appellate counsel, Bill
Leathers, is hereby ORDERED to: 1) review the record; 2) determine whether appellant
has a right to appeal; and 3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to
whether appellant has a right to appeal and/or advise this Court as to the existence of
any amended certification.
If appellant’s counsel determines that appellant has a right to appeal, counsel is
further ORDERED to file a motion with this Court within thirty days of receipt of this
notice, identifying and explaining substantive reasons why appellant has a right to
appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3, 44.4; see also, e.g., Carroll v. State, No. 04-03-
00473-CR, 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 7317 (San Antonio 2003, no pet.) (designated for
publication) (certification form provided in appendix to appellate rules may be modified
to reflect that defendant has right of appeal under circumstances not addressed by the
form). The motion must include an analysis of the applicable case law, and any factual
allegations therein must be true and supported by the record. Cf. Woods v. State, 108
S.W.3d 314, 316 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (construing former appellate rule 25.2(b)(3)
and holding that recitations in the notice of appeal must be true and supported by the
record). Copies of record documents necessary to evaluate the alleged error in the
certification affecting appellant’s right to appeal shall be attached to the motion. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1, 10.2.
2
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the
14th day of May, 2014.
3