Brian Chadwick Martin v. State

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                         In The

                                                Court of Appeals

                        Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

 

                                                ______________________________

 

                                                             No. 06-11-00210-CR

                                                ______________________________

 

 

                              BRIAN CHADWICK MARTIN, Appellant

 

                                                                V.

 

                                     THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

 

                                                                                                  

 

 

                                         On Appeal from the 8th Judicial District Court

                                                           Hopkins County, Texas

                                                          Trial Court No. 1122186

 

                                                                                                   

 

 

 

                                          Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

                                        Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss


                                                      MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

            Brian Chadwick Martin has filed a notice of appeal.  We have now received the certification of Martin’s right of appeal as required by Tex. R. App. P. 25.2.  That certification states that Martin waived his right of appeal.

            Unless a certification, showing that a defendant has the right of appeal, is in the record, we must dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).  Because the trial court’s certification affirmatively shows that Martin has waived his right of appeal, and because the record before us does not reflect that the certification is incorrect, see Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005), we must dismiss the appeal.

            Martin has also filed a motion to dismiss his appeal.  The motion is signed by Martin and by his counsel in compliance with Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  As authorized by Rule 42.2, we grant the motion.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2.

            We dismiss the appeal.

 

 

                                                                                    Josh R. Morriss, III

                                                                                    Chief Justice

 

Date Submitted:          January 4, 2012

Date Decided:        January 5, 2012                

 

Do Not Publish

s=MsoNormal style='text-align:justify;text-justify:inter-ideograph; mso-pagination:widow-orphan;page-break-after:avoid'>

 

Date Submitted:          July 11, 2011

Date Decided:             August 2, 2011

 

Do Not Publish



[1]Originally appealed to the Twelfth Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts.  See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 73.001 (West 2005).  We are unaware of any conflict between precedent of the Twelfth Court of Appeals and that of this Court on any relevant issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 41.3.

 

[2]In the same proceeding, Brown pled guilty to two state jail felony charges of manufacture or delivery of a controlled substance, cocaine, less than one gram (our cause numbers 06-11-00022-CR and 06-11-00024-CR).  See generally Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.112 (West 2010).  Brown has filed a single brief raising the same issue in all three cases; we reach the same result in those other two cases, released today in separate opinions bearing those cause numbers.