State v. Raul Becerra Castorena

Raul Becerra Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas Thursday, February 26, 2015 No. 04-14-00671-CR The State of Texas, Appellant v. Raul Becerra Castorena, Appellee From the 63rd Judicial District Court, Val Verde County, Texas Trial Court No. 11297CR The Honorable Enrique Fernandez, Judge Presiding ORDER Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice The State of Texas appeals the trial court’s September 3, 2014, order granting Raul Becerra Castorena’s motion to quash the indictment. That order resulted from a hearing held in the trial court on July 26, 2012. The official reporter notified this court that he was away from the court on the day of the hearing on the motion to quash and that he had been unable to ascertain whether a record was made of the proceedings. When the trial court and the court reporter were unable to identify and locate the reporter who may have taken the record, we abated the appeal for the trial court to conduct a hearing and make fact findings. In accordance with our order, the trial court held hearings on January 29, 2015 and February 12, 2015, and made written findings. The court’s findings and reporter’s records of the hearings have been filed in a supplemental record. The court’s findings are attached to this order. We reinstate this appeal on the docket of this court and adopt the trial court’s findings. Record of the July 26, 2012 hearing We conclude that the record of the July 26, 2012, hearing, if one was taken, has been lost or destroyed and cannot be replaced. However, the State was required to request the record in writing at or before the time for perfecting the appeal and file a copy of the request with the trial court clerk. TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(b)(1), (2). The deadline for perfecting the appeal in this case was September 23, 2014. The trial court found that no written request for the reporter’s record was made, and no request appears in the clerk’s record or on the docket sheet. The trial court was unable to determine when the State’s informal request for the record was made, other than that the request was made on or before December 8, 2014. This appeal will proceed without a record of the July 26, 2012, hearing unless the State files a response by March 9, 2015 (1) establishing that it timely requested the record be prepared and (2) explaining why the record of the July 26, 2012, non-evidentiary hearing is necessary to the resolution of the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(f)(1), (3). Record of the March 2011 trial During the abatement, the State made the court reporter and trial court aware that it is also requesting a complete record of the March 2011 jury trial that resulted in a mistrial. The court noted that the court reporters have begun preparing the record. We order court reporters John Price and Gene Steele to file the reporter’s record of the March 2011 trial by March 30, 2015. If agreed or substitute copies of State’s Exhibit 2 and Defendant’s Exhibit 3 have not been provided to the reporters by the time the record is due, the record should be filed with placeholders indicating those exhibits are missing. State’s Exhibit 2 and Defendant’s Exhibit 3 from the March 2011 trial The trial court found that Defendant’s Exhibit 3 is lost and that State’s Exhibit 2 may be lost. We order the parties to cooperate in attempting to reach an agreement as to replacement copies of these exhibits and to deliver the agreed replacements to the court reporter. We order the State to file a report, no later than March 19, 2015, both with this court and the trial court, either stating that the exhibits have been replaced by agreement or setting forth the reasons no agreement could be reached and the nature of any disagreements about the accuracy of any proposed replacement. If the exhibits are not replaced by agreement of the parties, the trial court shall make findings, with or without a hearing at the trial court’s discretion, as to whether either exhibit can be replaced “with a copy determined by the trial court to accurately duplicate with reasonable certainty the original exhibit.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(f)(4). If the exhibits can be replaced, they should be delivered to the court reporter for inclusion in the record. Any findings made by the trial court pursuant to this order should be filed with this court in a supplemental record by March 30, 2015. _________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 26th day of February, 2015. ___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court