Stephens & Johnson Operating Co. Henry W. Breyer, III, Trust CAH, Ltd.-MOPI for Capital Account CAH, Ltd.-Stivers Capital Account CAH, Ltd.-Wiegand Resources Capital Account Wiegand Resources C.T. Carden Myrl W. Deitch Trust E.R. Godbout Family Tru v. Charles W. Schroeder, Elsie A. Schroeder Schneider, Hollis London, Terry Mengers Reel, Ted Mengers, Debbie Mengers Quates, August H. Setinmeyer, Carole Schroeder Miller, James M. Schroeder, Sally Schroeder Tinanus, James E. Schroeder, Sue Schroeder Stanfo

Summarize Case

Related Cases

Charles W. /s Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 9, 2015 No. 04-14-00167-CV STEPHENS & JOHNSON OPERATING CO.; Henry W. Breyer, III, Trust; CAH, Ltd.-MOPI for Capital Account; CAH, Ltd.-Stivers Capital Account; CAH, Ltd.-Wiegand Resources Capital Account Wiegand Resources; C.T. Carden; Myrl W. Deitch Trust; E.R. Godbout Family Trust; Margaret J. Godbout; F.R. Keydel; R.L. Keydel; Pennye K. Maloney; David R. McNitt; RCA Trust One; Donald B. Scott; Sunset Production Corporation; Genessee Country Museum, Appellants v. Charles W. SCHROEDER, Elsie A. Schroeder Schneider, Hollis London, Terry Mengers Reel, Ted Mengers, Debbie Mengers Quates, August H. Setinmeyer, Carole Schroeder Miller, James M. Schroeder, Sally Schroeder Tinanus, James E. Schroeder, Sue Schroeder Stanford, Bill Schroeder, Wayne Hennecke, Diane Hennecke Rhodes, Jerri James, W. Tom Hailey, and Peggy Hailey, Appellees From the 229th Judicial District Court, Jim Hogg County, Texas Trial Court No. CC-04-143 Honorable Ana Lisa Garza, Judge Presiding ORDER Appellees’ brief was originally due January 4, 2015; however, the court granted appellees extensions of time until February 5 to file the brief. The brief was not filed. Instead, appellees filed a motion asking for a further extension until March 6, 2015, to file the brief. We grant the motion and order appellees’ brief due March 6, 2015. Appellees are advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent a motion that (1) demonstrates extraordinary circumstances justifying further delay, (2) advises the court of the efforts counsel has expended in preparing the brief, and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance that the brief will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline. The court does not generally consider a heavy work schedule to be an extraordinary circumstance. _________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 9th day of February, 2015. ___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court