Ralph Lopezs
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
February 4, 2015
No. 04-15-00012-CV
John E. RODARTE, Sr.,
Appellant
v.
Ralph LOPEZ, et al,
Appellee
From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2005-CI-18884
Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding
ORDER
Appellant John E. Rodarte Sr., an inmate acting pro se, filed an appeal from the trial
court’s order dismissing his bill of review. A filing fee of $195.00 was due from Rodarte when
this appeal was filed, but it was not paid. See TEXAS SUPREME COURT ORDER REGARDING FEES
CHARGED IN THE SUPREME COURT, IN CIVIL CASES IN THE COURTS OF APPEALS, AND BEFORE THE
JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION (Misc. Docket No. 13-9127, Aug. 16, 2013). The
clerk of the court notified Rodarte of this deficiency in a letter dated January 12, 2015. The fee
remains unpaid. Rule 5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides:
A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must pay—
at the time an item is presented for filing—whatever fees are required by statute
or Supreme Court order. The appellate court may enforce this rule by any order
that is just.
TEX. R. APP. P. 5.
We therefore order John E. Rodarte Sr. to either (1) pay the filing fee to this court by
February 19, 2015 or (2) provide written proof to this court by February 19, 2015 that he is
indigent or otherwise excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying
the fee. See Tex. R. APP. P. 20.1 (setting forth requirements of affidavit or unsworn declaration of
inability to pay costs); TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE §§ 14.001 et seq. (West 2002 & Supp.
2014) (requiring inmate who files affidavit or unsworn declaration of inability to pay costs of
appeal to additionally file certified copy of inmate trust account statement and affidavit listing
previous pro se actions).
If Rodarte fails to respond satisfactorily within the time ordered, this appeal will be
dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3; Douglas v. Turner, 441 S.W.3d 337 (Tex. App.—Waco
2013, no pet.) (dismissing appeal where inmate failed to comply with Chapter 14 requirements in
appellate court); Douglas v. Moffett, 418 S.W.3d 336 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2013, no
pet.).
_________________________________
Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 4th day of February, 2015.
___________________________________
Keith E. Hottle
Clerk of Court