NUMBER 13-13-00601-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________
DANTE ROBINSON AND
CHARLOTTE M. LEWIS-ROBINSON,
INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A AALTO
AUTO SALES, Appellants,
v.
SERGIO ALEJANDRO VALLE
RAMIREZ, A/K/A SERGIO O. VALLE, Appellee.
____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2
of Travis County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Longoria
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellants filed an appeal from a judgment rendered by the County Court at Law
No. 2 of Travis County in cause number C-1-CV-12-011037. This appeal was
transferred to this Court from the Third Court of Appeals by order of the Texas Supreme
Court. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.220(a) (West Supp. 2011) (delineating the
jurisdiction of appellate courts); TEX.GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West 2005) (granting
the supreme court the authority to transfer cases from one court of appeals to another at
any time that there is “good cause” for the transfer).
On January 22, 2014, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's
record in the above cause was originally due on December 27, 2013, and that the deputy
district clerk, C. Jones, had notified this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements
for payment of the clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect
so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within
ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want
of prosecution.
On January 14, 2014, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that she was
delinquent in remitting a $195.00 filing fee. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant that
the appeal was subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid within ten days from the
date of receipt of this letter. See id. 42.3(b),(c).
Appellant has failed to respond to this Court’s notices and has failed to pay the
filing fee. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the
6th day of March, 2014.
2