Victor R. Martinez v. State

The State of TexasAppellee/s Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 17, 2014 No. 04-14-00778-CR Victor R. MARTINEZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010CR5362 Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding ORDER The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately reflects that the criminal case is a plea-bargain case. 1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). It is therefore ORDERED that this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless appellant causes an amended trial court certification to be filed by January 15, 2015, showing appellant has the right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State,110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.). All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending our resolution of the certification issue. _________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 17th day of December, 2014. ___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court 1 The plea bargain states, “If defendant fails to appear for sentencing on March 28, 2011, he is exposed to the full range of punishment.” The defendant failed to appear for sentencing on March 28, 2011.